<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are there only Sport Utility Vehicles and Sport Utility Trucks? Why are there no Sport Utility Cars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2</link>
	<description>Good Training to keep you fit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ModelFlyerChick</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2/comment-page-1#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>ModelFlyerChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>A crossover is a sport utility car. Some manufacturers call these cars &quot;cross country&quot; (Volvo for example). They aren&#039;t called that because if you use the shorthand version it&#039;s an SUC. No manufacturer uses that term because it invites negative thinking against the car. It&#039;s the same sort of thought process from the past when people teased others who owned cars that were painted yellow by calling them lemons.
Think about it...would you want to drive an SUC and have people saying your car sucks? Or would you rather drive the same thing but call it a crossover or cross country?&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A crossover is a sport utility car. Some manufacturers call these cars &quot;cross country&quot; (Volvo for example). They aren&#8217;t called that because if you use the shorthand version it&#8217;s an SUC. No manufacturer uses that term because it invites negative thinking against the car. It&#8217;s the same sort of thought process from the past when people teased others who owned cars that were painted yellow by calling them lemons.<br />
Think about it&#8230;would you want to drive an SUC and have people saying your car sucks? Or would you rather drive the same thing but call it a crossover or cross country?<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan S</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2/comment-page-1#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorpressley.com/sport-cars/why-are-there-only-sport-utility-vehicles-and-sport-utility-trucks-why-are-there-no-sport-utility-cars-2#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>The Subaru Outback is a sport utility car.  So is the Audi Allroad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Subaru Outback is a sport utility car.  So is the Audi Allroad.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
